Shashidhar . S.Kapur
The budget 2019 of Madhya Pradesh was hardly that – it was merely a manager’s statement of accounts -cum -Munshi’s Bahi Khaata. While it was better than the recent state budgets – as also the latest Union budget- in that it was relatively rigourous in numbers yet it fell short in lacking a vision.
It can be
termed as a “ complementary budget” ( rather than supplementary ) since the major items in interim budget
presented before LS polls have been left out to a great extent in the main budget. Granted that post GST the conventional budget has become defunct as there is little
scope for taxation by the state governments and there are limits to public
borrowing. All that remains is juggling of
priorities and allocations. An innovative- improvising approach could’ve
been adopted ; instead the easier way
out of enhancing tax on petrol outside the budget , improving
the ease of liquor business and attempting greater revenue from the real estate was adopted. While
bringing industry back onto the focus is
welcome but one will have to wait for
concrete signs before congratulating.
On the whole,
highlights included mention of national
, global economic scenario-
which was a first ; a two thirds
raise in allocation for agriculture; enhanced focus on tourism –
though improving the hotels as key was
odd-which would primarily aid travel than tourism ; branding of
traditional produce is a welcome step; interesting scheme for revival
of rivers- must complement the river linking projects;
enhanced funding for urban development and
Panchayats ( forthcoming local bodies elections may be a factor)
besides Education ; health Budget is
increased sustainably by 32 per cent –
to complement the primary health
push of the centre.
Agriculture
gets 54 thousand crores including 8000 cr. for loan waiver and emphasis on processing , horticulture ;Budget for Social Justice Department
is . 2891 crore, an increase of 43 percent on account of pension and increase
in provision of CM Kanya Vivah Nikaah Yojana.;Construction of satellite towns,
industrial area and dry port on Bhopal-Indore expressway; Rs. 33,467 crore for
Tribal Sub-Schemes ; Rs. 22,793 crore for Scheduled Cast
Sub-Schemes-are some of the key allocations.
Besides the absence of a vision dark aspects include the overall math not adding up. There is no mention of the aimed growth rate.( Perhaps the fudged growth rates of 20% and thereabouts in agriculture and double digit overall by Shivraj Govt. would be difficult to match with credible data). No allocation to several announcements ; no matching resources for the central schemes- in health and housing for all ( perhaps to scuttle them); Reduction in real estate duty with the hope for greater overall receipts may not materialize ; odd choices in having international Football and swimming academies- MP is not exactly a leader in these; Tax Revenue estimates are 23.69 percent higher as compared to 2018-19 and Capital expenditure for the year 2019-20 is estimated to be Rs. 35463.90 crore as against Rs. 29256.78 crore for the year 2018-19, an increase of 21.22- both look inflated… two most dangerous steps are resource monetization- Land pooling pilot underway and borrowings – esp. from open market (borrowings of 40 thousand crores in the first six months)- unless carefully handled this could mean mortgaging the future of this state. Surprisingly there was no mention of data governance.
All in all
,the stamp of Congress template is all
pervasive in the budget albeit in a new form. Farmers , Tribals ,SC /ST youth
have got a massive hike,
Education and Industry ,Infrastructure ,health and housing , women have increased and there is huge borrowing .This is a double
edged sword where delivery would hold the key.
One really
hopes that while the best practices of
previous regimes are continued
the worst procedures are dropped .In this context it would’ve been a good idea
to have a separate Krishi Budget (
The Shivraj govt. had
Krishi Cabinet ) – it was one of the promises in the national manifesto
; the multiple supplementary budgets
could be avoided.
In the
current global scenario , the relative power of
national governments is on the
wane .They in turn try and
dominate the regional governments
and so on till the local bodies. Such a situation means
that, MP can only grow in absolute terms if
and only if it has its own
economic model. Bereft of which ,MP will perpetually remain a laggard even if
technically it sheds the BIMARU
tag
***